Cubic NLW/NLKG on R3

From DispersiveWiki

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Scaling is sc = 1 / 2.
  • LWP for s \geq 1/2 by Strichartz estimates (see e.g. LbSo1995; earlier references exist)
    • When s = 1 / 2 the time of existence depends on the profile of the data and not just on the norm.
    • One can improve the critical space H1 / 2 to a slightly weaker Besov space (Pl-p2).
    • For s < 1 / 2 one has instantaneous blowup in the focusing case, and unbounded growth of H^s norms in the defocusing case (CtCoTa-p2).
  • GWP for s > 3 / 4 (KnPoVe-p2) for defocussing NLKG.(An alternate proof is in GalPl2003).
    • For s\geq1 this is clear from energy conservation (for both NLKG and NLW).
    • One also has GWP and scattering for data with small H1 / 2 norm for general cubic non-linearities (and for either NLKG or NLW).
    • In the defocussing case one has scattering for large H1 data (BaeSgZz1990), see also (Hi-p3).
    • Improvement is certainly possible, both in lowering the s index and in replacing NLKG with NLW.
    • In the focussing case there is blowup from large data by the ODE method.
  • For periodic defocussing NLKG there is a weak turbulence effect in Hs for s > 5 (low frequencies decay in time) but a symplectic non-squeezing effect in H^{1/2} Kuk1995b.In particular Hs cannot be a symplectic phase space for s > 5.
Personal tools