Linear wave estimates

From DispersiveWiki

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Fixed-time estimates for free solutions f :
    • (Energy estimate) If f(0) is in Hs, then f(t) is also.
    • (Decay estimate) If f(0) has more than (d + 1) / 2 derivatives in L1, then \| f (t)\|_{L^\infty} decays like < t > − (d − 1) / 2. One can obtain the endpoint of (d + 1) / 2 derivatives if one is willing to localize in frequency or use Hardy spaces and BMO.
    • One can interpolate between these estimates to get (Lp,Lp') estimates with the sharp loss of regularity Br1975. This is useful for Strichartz estimates and for scattering theory.
  • Strichartz estimates: A free \dot{H}^s solution is in L^q_t L^r_x if
    • (Scaling) d / 2 − s = 1 / q + d / r
    • (Parallel interactions) (d-1)/4 \geq 1/q + (d-1)/2r
    • (Increase of integrability) q, r \geq 2
    • (No double endpoints) (n,q,r) \neq (3, 2, \infty)
      • This estimate can be recovered for radial functions KlMa1993, or when a small amount of smoothing (either in the Sobolev sense, or in relaxing the integrability) in the radial variable [MacNkrNaOz-p].However in the general case one cannot recover the estimate even if one uses the BMO norm or attempts Littlewood-Paley frequency localization Mo1998
      • Actually even when n > 3, the (q,r) = (2,\infty) estimate is slightly subtle; one has BMO and Besov space estimates but not directly L^\infty estimates. However, the endpoint (q,r) = (2,2(d − 1) / (d − 3)) is OK; see KeTa1998.
    • In the case s = 1 / 2,d = 3,q = r = 4, a maximizer exists (e.g. with initial position zero and initial velocity given by the Cauchy distribution 1 / 1 + | x | 2), witih best constant (3pi / 4)1 / 4 [Fc-p4]
    • These results extend globally outside of a convex obstacle [Bu-p], SmhSo1995, [SmhSo-p], [Met-p]; see [So-p] for a survey of this issue and applications to nonlinear wave equations outside of an obstacle.
    • For data which is radial (or otherwise enjoys additional angular regularity) a much larger range of Strichartz estimates is possible (basically because the parallel interaction obstruction is substantially weakened); see [Stz-p4] for further discussion.

These estimates extend to some extent to the Klein-Gordon equation \Box u = m^2 u.A useful heuristic to keep in mind is that this equation behaves like the Schrodinger equation u + iut + 1 / (2mu = 0 when the frequency ξ has magnitude less than m, but behaves like the wave equation for higher frequencies.Some basic Strichartz estimates here are in MsSrWa1980; see for instance [Na-p], [MacNaOz-p], [MacNkrNaOz-p] for more recent treatments.

For inhomogeneous estimates it is known that a solution with zero initial data and forcing term containing s-1 derivatives in a dual space {L^{Q'}_t} {L^{R'}_x} will lie in L^q_t L^r_x if both (q,r) and (Q,R) are admissible in the above sense, if s \geq 0, and if one has the scaling condition

1 / Q + d / R + 1 / q + d / r = d + s + 1.The \u201cs-1\u201d represents a smoothing effect of one derivative, though this full gain is only attainable if one uses the energy exponents L^1_t L^2_x and {L^{\infty}_t} {L^2_x}. It is possible to obtain inhomogeneous estimates in which only one of the exponents are admissible; this phenomenon was first observed in Har1990, Ob1989 (see also KeTa1998).More recently in [Fc-p2], inhomogeneous estimates are obtained with the above scaling condition assuming the weaker conditions 1 \leq q,r \leq \infty and 1 / q < (n − 1)(1 / 2 − 1 / r) or (q,r) = (\infty,2) and similarly for Q,R, and if the following additional conditions hold:

In d = 1,2 no further conditions are required;

When d = 3, r,R are required to be finite;

When d > 3, either 1 / q + 1 / Q < 1, (n-3)/r \leq (n-1)/R, and (n-3)/R \leq (n-1)/r, or 1 / q + 1 / Q = 1, (n-3)/r < (n-1)/R, (n-3)/R < (n-1)/r, r \geq q, and R \geq Q.

Strichartz estimates extend to situations in which there is a potential or when the metric is variable.For local-in-time estimates and smooth potentials or

metrics this is fairly straightforward (the potential can be treated by iterative methods, and the metric by parametrix methods).More interesting issues

arise for global-in-time estimates with smooth potentials/metrics or local-in-time estimates with rough potentials/metrics (the two types of results are linked by

scaling).For potentials of power-type decay, the global results are as follows:

For potentials of the form V = a / | x | 2 with d \geq 3 and a > − (d − 2)2 / 4, one has global Strichartz estimates [BuPlStaTv-p]; a simplified proof and more general result dealing with inverse square-like potentials which are not too negative is in [BuPlStaTv-p2]. The condition on a is necessary to avoid bound states.For potentials decaying slower than this, Strichartz estimates can fail. For potentials decaying an epsilon faster than 1 / | x | 2 and assumed to be nonnegative, dispersive and Strichartz estimates were obtained when d = 3 in GeVis2003.

(More results to be added in future).

Personal tools